Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Author: aftu

August undefined, 2024

http://kb.icai.org/pdfs/PDFFile5b4f18e43e2db4.51472745.pdf WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the provisions of Section 271C dealt with penalty for failure to deduct the tax and not delayed payment of tax. The court accepting the arguments of the Appellant’s AR that the penal provisions ...

Income Tax - Levy of penalty u/s 271C - delay in deposit of Tax ...

WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB, 271FB, 271G, 271GA, 271GB, 271H, 271-I, 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or assessee … WebAug 3, 2024 · The plain reading of section 271 (1) (c) of Income Tax act 1961 clearly states as follows “Concealment of particulars of income or fringe benefits or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or fringe benefits” and levies penalty of minimum 100% as a fine and maximum 300% of tax sought to be evaded in addition to tax payable. flag of new orleans la

No Section 271C Penalty on mere belated TDS …

WebSep 7, 2024 · 3.Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) of Rs.4,60,000 was levied vide order dated 26/04/2024. 4.On appeal CIT (A) deleted the Penalty on the sole ground taken regarding … WebIncome Tax Penalty u/s 271C - failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source - without declaring the assessee as assessee in default under section 201(1) no penalty … WebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after the same has been deducted by the assessee. The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar observed that the relevant words used in Section canon cameras capable of 4k

Annual Increment earned by Govt Servant for Past period can

Section 271C of the Income Tax Act - TDS Provisions - IndiaFilings

The penalty under section 271C is applicable under the following conditions – 1. The person fails to deduct, the whole or part of, tax at source (i.e. TDS). 2. The person fails to pay, the whole or part of, Dividend Distribution … See more In case of default, the penalty under section 271Cis leviable to the extent of an amount equal to TDS not deducted / not paid. See more Q 1. What is Chapter XVIIB? Ans:Chapter XVII of the Income Tax Act covers provisions relating to ‘Collection and recovery of tax’. Part B of Chapter XVII (i.e. Chapter XVIIB) covers … See more WebApr 11, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the provisions of Section 271C dealt with penalty for failure to deduct the tax and not delayed payment of tax. ... 271C and 273B of Income-tax Act,1961: Counsel(s): Counsels : Dowload Pdf File ... canon cameras for filmWebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB , 271FB, 271G, 271GA , 271GB , 271H, 271-I , 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or … canon cameras for filming

"" - Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

US Technology International Pvt ltd Vs Commissioner of Income-tax …

Web1 day ago · The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was served on the assessee on 22.09.2016. The Assessing Officer(AO) passed assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 The AO has levied penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the penalty order the Assessee had filed appeal … WebApr 10, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201(1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/for the period of delay in remittance of TDS. On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS.

Did you know?

WebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source … WebApr 12, 2024 · On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy a penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. The High Court vide impugned judgment and order has dismissed the appeal preferred by the assessee by holding that failure to deduct/remit the TDS would attract a penalty under …

WebApr 10, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201(1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/for the period of delay in remittance of … Web1. confirming penalty of Rs.1,81,00,765 u/s. 271C of I. T. Act, 1961. 2. confirming the above penalty on the ground that the eventhough the appellant had claimed that the parties to whom payments were made had paid the taxes whereever applicable in their individual capacity, the appellant had not submitted any documents in support of the same.

WebApr 10, 2024 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that on true interpretation of Section 271C, there shall not be any penalty u/s 271C on mere delay in remittance of the TDS after … WebNov 11, 2014 · However, the AO did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and levied penalty U/S 271C of the Act vide order dt. 18th Aug., 2010. Being aggrieved, the …

WebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after its deduction by the ...

WebProvided Â that no penalty shall be levied in respect of income referred to in section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D to the extent such … canon camera serial number lookupWebApr 11, 2024 · 11 April 2024 3:15 AM GMT. The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of … canon cameras for recordingWebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the … flag of new zealandWebJan 3, 2024 · Assessee had furnished complete details as regards its claim of deduction under Sec. 80IB (4) of the Act, thus merely for the reason that the said claim of deduction … flag of new yorkWebSection 271C (1): (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or. (b) pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or … canon cameras for intermediateWebApr 11, 2013 · Section 271C. If any person fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid.This penalty is imposable by Joint Commissioner. canon cameras for professional photographersWebNov 19, 2015 · Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, mandates that a specified percentage of Tax is required to be deducted by the payer at the time of making certain payments to the payee. … flag of nicaragua wikipedia